A piece for E!Sharp. On May 7 the European question in UK politics and the British question in EU politics will be reframed, not settled.
http://esharp.eu/big-debates/the-uk-and-europe/282-will-the-british-question-go-away-if-labour-wins/
Senior Lecturer at the Institute for Diplomacy and International Governance at Loughborough University London.
Friday, May 01, 2015
Tuesday, April 14, 2015
Conferences
It's conference season...
Political Studies Association, Sheffield (30 March - 1 April). I gave a paper on 'London's Empire: the role of Greater London in UK politics and international policy'.
Britain in Europe, University of Bedfordshire (8 April). I gave a paper on 'The UK and the EU: What would a "Brexit" mean for the EU and other states around the world?'
The State of the Union, Liverpool John Moores University (9 April). I gave a paper on 'London Calling: Devolution for Greater London?'
British exit from the EU? Legal and political implications for Europe, University of Copenhagen (16 April). I'll be talking about the geopolitical implications of a British exit.
Political Studies Association, Sheffield (30 March - 1 April). I gave a paper on 'London's Empire: the role of Greater London in UK politics and international policy'.
Britain in Europe, University of Bedfordshire (8 April). I gave a paper on 'The UK and the EU: What would a "Brexit" mean for the EU and other states around the world?'
The State of the Union, Liverpool John Moores University (9 April). I gave a paper on 'London Calling: Devolution for Greater London?'
British exit from the EU? Legal and political implications for Europe, University of Copenhagen (16 April). I'll be talking about the geopolitical implications of a British exit.
Saturday, March 28, 2015
Will the UK’s general election lead to an in-out referendum?
A piece for E!Sharp on the seven scenarios through which the forthcoming UK general election could lead to an in-out referendum on UK membership of the EU:
http://esharp.eu/essay/37-will-the-uk-s-general-election-lead-to-an-in-out-referendum/
http://esharp.eu/essay/37-will-the-uk-s-general-election-lead-to-an-in-out-referendum/
Thursday, March 19, 2015
Britain's European Question Will Not Be Answered by an In-Out Vote
Another piece, this one for the Huffington Post, on the limits of a British referendum on EU membership.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/tim-oliver/eu-referendum_b_6895716.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/tim-oliver/eu-referendum_b_6895716.html
Thursday, January 29, 2015
Piece for UACES: Europe's Brexit Question
Focusing on what a Brexit could mean for Britain overlooks the more important question of what it could mean for Europe.
Scan any newspaper article, click on any blog post or read any academic paper on the subject of Britain leaving the EU and you’ll find the focus is on what it would mean for Britain and whether or not it will happen. This seems logical enough, but it leaves a gaping hole in the analysis.
Discussing a Brexit should also be a discussion about Europe and what European integration would mean if the people of one of the largest European states – a state that is a core part of European identity, politics, economics, culture and power – democratically voted to quit the leading organisation for pan-European cooperation and unity. That would not be an insignificant moment in the history of the EU.
To continue reading the piece please following this link:
http://uacesoneurope.ideasoneurope.eu/2015/01/29/europes-brexit-question/
Labels:
Brexit,
EU,
European geopolitics,
Euroscepticism,
UK-EU
Wednesday, January 28, 2015
Latest post for E!Sharp: Can an in-out referendum solve the European question in British politics?
The prospect of an in-out referendum is one we all know will figure in the UK’s forthcoming general election. The average British voter might care little for the nuances of EU membership, or even say the issue ranks high in their election priorities. But it weaves itself into so many issues that we can expect it to be up there in the headlines, especially with the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats and UKIP all committed – in varying ways – to holding an in-out referendum.
It is hoped that a referendum can allow the British people to once and for all solve the question of Britain’s commitment to Europe, providing a cathartic, decisive decision whether it be to stay or go. Given such expectations we need to take a step back and realise that all sides – both Eurosceptics and pro-Europeans – risk expecting too much of a referendum.
The European question is a multifaceted one driven primarily by Britain’s domestic politics. It was for this reason that when I recently wrote an article on this topic for International Affairs, the Chatham House journal, I gave it the title ‘To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question?’ In short: no. Britain’s European question is connected to a range of issues – constitutional change, changing identities, political economy, fragmenting party politics, responses to globalisation and the changing geopolitics of Europe – not simply whether Britain wants to be formally in or out of the EU.
...
To continue reading the piece please follow this link.
Labels:
Brexit,
British Politics,
in-out referendum,
UK-EU
Thursday, January 15, 2015
To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question? Britain's European question and an in/out referendum.
My latest piece - out today in International Affairs - on UK-EU relations explaining why a referendum will not solve the European question in British politics. Link here.
Oliver, Tim (2015) 'To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question? Britain's European question an an in/out referendum', International Affairs, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp 77–91.
Abstract:
The idea of holding an in/out referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union has increasingly become a norm of British politics, an act seen as a necessary step for the country to answer what David Cameron described as the ‘European question in British politics’. A referendum, it is hoped, will cleanse British politics of a poisonous debate about Europe and democratically sanction a new stable UK–EU relationship, whether the UK stays in or leaves. Such hopes expect more of a referendum than it can provide. The European question is a multifaceted one and whatever the result of a referendum it is unlikely to address underlying questions that will continue to cause problems for UK–EU relations and Britain's European debate. A referendum can be a step forward in better managing the relationship and debate, but it is only that: a single step, after which further steps will be needed. Coming to terms with the European question and bringing stability to Britain's relations with the EU—whether in or outside the EU—will require comprehensive, longer-term changes which a referendum can help trigger but in no way guarantee.
Oliver, Tim (2015) 'To be or not to be in Europe: is that the question? Britain's European question an an in/out referendum', International Affairs, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp 77–91.
Abstract:
The idea of holding an in/out referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union has increasingly become a norm of British politics, an act seen as a necessary step for the country to answer what David Cameron described as the ‘European question in British politics’. A referendum, it is hoped, will cleanse British politics of a poisonous debate about Europe and democratically sanction a new stable UK–EU relationship, whether the UK stays in or leaves. Such hopes expect more of a referendum than it can provide. The European question is a multifaceted one and whatever the result of a referendum it is unlikely to address underlying questions that will continue to cause problems for UK–EU relations and Britain's European debate. A referendum can be a step forward in better managing the relationship and debate, but it is only that: a single step, after which further steps will be needed. Coming to terms with the European question and bringing stability to Britain's relations with the EU—whether in or outside the EU—will require comprehensive, longer-term changes which a referendum can help trigger but in no way guarantee.
Labels:
Brexit,
Euroscepticism,
in-out referendum,
UK-EU
Monday, January 12, 2015
Speaking event next week in Brussels.
Next week I'm speaking at a UACES run event in Brussels on the possible implications for the EU and Europe of a British exit. Details below and can be found here.
An EU without Britain: a Lesser or Stronger Europe?
Date/Time
Date(s) - 20/01/2015
An EU without Britain: a Lesser or Stronger Europe?
Date/Time
Date(s) - 20/01/2015
6:00 pm - 7:30 pm
Location The Centre, 2nd Floor
The Centre and the University Association of Contemporary European Studies (UACES) invite you to a presentation and panel debate.
A Brexit could profoundly change the EU, Europe’s geopolitics, transatlantic relations and the study of European integration. While a British withdrawal is not inevitable, the possibility has increased and depends not only on developments in Britain but on how the rest of the EU responds to its ‘British question’. Dr Tim Oliver, lecturer at the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst, argues that very little analysis exists of what a Brexit could mean for the EU and what choices the EU faces. Britain’s own Brexit debate is equally oblivious to the wider implications of Britain leaving the EU.
Is a renegotiated relationship with the UK less acceptable than a Brexit? Should the EU fear or focus on the possibility of a Brexit? Can Britain use a Brexit as leverage to secure a renegotiation? Should the EU rule out a new treaty out of fear it could trigger an in-out referendum and Brexit? How might a Brexit change the geopolitics of Europe?
Dr Tim Oliver will present his research on the topic, followed by a panel discussion with:
- György Schöpflin MEP, Member of the European Parliament Committee on Constitutional Affairs
- Fabian Zuleeg, Chief Executive Officer at the European Policy Centre
Friday, December 19, 2014
Written evidence to the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy
Evidence submitted back in September, addressing the committee's question of how the 2015 NSS should handle the uncertainty over the UK’s role in Europe. My evidence appears on pages 53-58:
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/joint-committees/national-security-strategy/The%20next%20security%20strategy%20(forth%20review)/ThenextNationalSecurityStrategyEvidence18122014.pdf
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/joint-committees/national-security-strategy/The%20next%20security%20strategy%20(forth%20review)/ThenextNationalSecurityStrategyEvidence18122014.pdf
Sunday, November 16, 2014
London, England, Britain and Europe: Places Apart?
A short piece about the position of London in English, UK and EU politics. Written for the blog of the APSA British Politics Group.
Academics are often as guilty as many others for lazily using ‘London’ as a catch-all term to describe the UK, UK Government, the financial institutions of ‘the City of London’, England, or ‘the South’ or South East of England. Of course, as the UK’s capital city this usage can often seem logical enough. But London is a place in itself, a city of millions with a distinct population, an economic and social system with its own needs and interests, a place with an identity and politics of its own.
At a time when attention is fixed on Scotland it is worth remembering that it is not just Scotland or areas such as Wales or Northern Ireland that are distinct political spaces. London, an area with a larger and faster growing population and economy than anywhere else in the UK, and the UK’s most powerful cultural and political centre, deserves more attention. And, for this author and others, it deserves its own fully devolved government. The ‘London question’ – how the rest of the UK relates to its capital city that is fast becoming another place – is one of the most pressing questions in British politics.
To continue reading please visit the blog of the APSA British Politics Group.
Labels:
devolution,
English politics,
London,
UK-EU
Friday, November 14, 2014
Piece for E!Sharp: 10 questions for the EU about a Brexit
Every week seems to bring a new row between Britain and the rest of the EU. UK-EU relations have never been what could be called stable or easy-going. But relations today seem to have reached new lows. Britain comes across as a wrecker or blackmailer that is ‘lighting a fire under the EU’, to quote Philip Hammond MP, Britain’s Foreign Secretary. Things are so bad that few doubt leaked reports that Angela Merkel is prepared to see Britain leave rather than agree to British demands to restrict freedom of movement within the EU.
If UK-EU differences cannot be reconciled and a British exit becomes highly likely - admittedly very big ifs in themselves - then the EU needs to give careful thought to ten questions about where this could lead it. Britain too will need to think about the EU’s likely answers. How UK-EU relations develop in the face of a Brexit will depend less on what London demands and more on how the rest of the EU - the much larger partner in this - responds.
For the full piece please visit: http://esharp.eu/big-debates/the-uk-and-europe/247-10-questions-for-the-eu-about-a-brexit/
Monday, October 27, 2014
Piece for European Geostrategy
![]() |
| For the complete piece follow this link: http://www.europeangeostrategy.org/2014/10/united-kingdom-europe-should-it-come-or-go/ |
Labels:
Brexit,
British foreign policy,
EU,
European geopolitics,
NATO,
UK-EU
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
